I wish that every human life might be pure transparent freedom - Simone de Beauvoir

Note: If this page opens on my post, A Vision of Hope, please click on the blog title, Loving The Wolf, for the latest updates.

I don't have time to update my blog very often, so please check my Twitter Feed below.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    Friday, December 5, 2008

    Deepak Chopra: In Defense of His Views


    I really feel that this piece by Deepak Chopra on the Huffington Post is worth reproducing here, because it allows him to present a full context for his views on a variety of subjects, but terrorism in particular, and comes in response to a vicious personal attack in the Murdoch-owned and ideologically very right wing Wall Street Journal.

    May Obama's presidency usher in an era of much broader and more inclusive world views and diminish the forces (such as the WSJ) that attempt to instill division and fear and primacy as the driving forces for our nation.

    We are great by being compassionate; we are powerful by understanding; we learn by listening; we contribute to human development by sharing love and showing strength and courage. Gentleness and inclusivity are strength, not weakness.  Always ask yourself: what values would you want a child to learn? Those are the values we should live by.


    Deepak Chopra

    Deepak Chopra

    Posted December 3, 2008 | 08:34 PM (EST)






    Show your support.
    Buzz this article up.
    Buzz up!

    When I first read Ms. Rabinowitz's personal attacks on me as the lead article on the opinion page of the Wall Street Journal, I have to confess that my first reaction was that she was an ethnocentric racist and prejudiced bigot. After some reflection, I realized that she was probably more ignorant than bigoted. I could have let the matter rest there, but aside from the personal attacks, there are a number of factual errors, that, in the spirit of clarity ought to be corrected.

    Ms. Rabinowitz is on the editorial board of the now Fox News-affiliated Wall Street Journal. Its editorial page has long been a faithful stenographer for the Neoconservatives and the Bush/Cheney administration's benighted approach to militant Islam. Elsewhere, my son addressed the complexity of the terrorist problem and the US involvement in it. Gotham Chopra has experience as a war correspondent in the Middle East, including Pakistan and Afghanistan. While returning from Afghanistan, he was arrested after interviewing an Afghani leader (which caused immense anguish for my wife and I). Suffice it to say that the causes of Islamic terrorism are complex. To trivialize my views on a topic as vast as terrorism with: "Deepak Blames America," as Ms. Rabinowitz has done, not only suggests how abysmally uninformed she is, but also speaks to the ever-sinking journalistic standards of her newspaper.

    Now on a more personal note: I am one of Midnight's Children as Salman Rushdie refers to those of us born during the tumultuous separation of what used to be the British Raj into the newly formed states of India and Pakistan. I came into this world amidst the carnage of the Hindu-Muslim riots that swept across the Indian subcontinent in the aftermath of the separation. Partition of the Indian subcontinent was an idea generated by the British colonial government and resulted in mass migrations of Muslims to Pakistan and Hindus to India. Both my parents grew up in what is now Pakistan. They, along with their parents, fled from Rawalpindi, now Islamabad. (My father went to medical school in Lahore, Pakistan.) They were innocent victims and refugees of a mass genocide and a collective psychosis that gripped the land at the time. Members of both sides of our family were murdered by Muslim extremists. And of course, countless Muslims in India were also slaughtered in the violence then. I grew up listening to stories of vicious brutality, but also stories of compassion, and acts of heroism that occurred on both sides of the Hindu-Muslim divide. Although my parents and grandparents lost all their possessions, their bank accounts, their homes, and many of their family members, still, in spite of all that, they never expressed any hostility. There were only stories--poignant, powerful, and tragic stories. I and my siblings grew up listening to these stories, and in turn, so did our children. Now Gotham and Mallika are telling these stories to their children as well.

    (Our son Gotham was born in Boston, but Mallika, our first child, was born in New Delhi. At the time, I was an intern training in medicine in the US and our health insurance did not cover the preexisting condition of pregnancy. So, since I could not afford the cost of my wife's delivery in the US, I sent her at the 11th hour to India where my father took care of the expenses.)

    Obviously I don't blame Ms. Rabinowitz for being unaware of my family's personal experience as victims of religious sectarian violence, but I hope she can appreciate that my interest in conflict resolution does have a real context in the area of religious extremism. Ms. Rabinowitz smirks, "how the ebullient Dr. Chopra had come to be chosen on an authority on terror remains something of a mystery." While I do not consider myself an authority on terrorism, it has had a formative impact on my life and I have used that experience and interest to become a serious student of the root causes of terrorism throughout my life. I am currently the president and one of the founders of the Alliance for a New Humanity. I, along with co-founders and Nobel Peace Laureates Oscar Arias and Betty Williams, are attempting to create a critical mass of awareness to address the deeper causes of global instability including war and terrorism, climate change, social injustice, and radical poverty.

    We live in a world were 50 percent of its population lives on less than two dollars a day and 20 percent lives on less than one dollar a day. We can't dismiss these as trivial facts if we want to understand the deeper causes of instability and violence in the world.

    Ms. Rabinowitz accuses me of being "a faithful adherent of the root causes of crime." As a matter of fact, I do adhere to the theory that crime does have sources that can be understood, and I haveaddressed this topic it as it pertains to terrorism in TIME magazine. Ms. Rabinowitz ought to realize that you can kill a terrorist, but that doesn't kill his ideology. And as long as that ideology has power and life, it will continue to regenerate new terrorists no matter how many terrorists you kill. The ideology of Islamic terrorism is barbaric, savage, brutal and primitive, yet still it is born in a context. That context is historical, cultural, religious, economic, and political. Refusing to understand that context, dooms us to an endless failed anti-terrorist policy.

    An ideology can only be overcome through the creation of a new more appealing ideology. In order to accomplish that we need the participation and help of moderate Muslims throughout the world. There are between 1.6 to 1.8 billion Muslims in the world, and by far, most of them are the moderates we need to enlist in our efforts. We can't solve this global problem by branding almost 25% of the world's population as terrorists. I would hope Ms. Rabinowitz could recognize that this issue is far too serious of a problem for her to exploit it for her personal petty agenda. The Mumbai tragedy obviously gathered extensive international attention. Instead of channeling this global focus toward productive insight and solutions, Ms. Rabinowitz chose instead to direct the attention of this tragedy into a personal attack that can only further fan the flames of hatred and exacerbate the situation instead of helping it.

    In a recent interview on Hannity and Colmes, my long-time friend, William Cohen, the former Secretary of Defense under Clinton, and a Republican, referred to Donald Rumsfeld's memo in which he reveals the futility of the Bush's approach to terrorism when he asks, "Are we creating more terrorists than we are killing?" Bill Cohen and I have worked together on race and reconciliationissues and have discussed these matters at great length. And in looking at the complex matter of terrorism, one thing is clear: the knee-jerk reaction, the eye for an eye Old Testament response to kill them all, is not going to be a successful long-term solution.

    Ms. Rabinowitz also says, "nor did we hear in these media meditations, any particular expression of sorrow from the New Delhi born Dr. Chopra for the anguish of Mumbai's victims." In the few second sound bites that are characteristic of the Larry King Live show, I did mention the media obsession for pointing out victims mainly of Western origin. I specifically told Larry that we should be feeling the anguish of everyone and that all lives were precious. Perhaps Ms. Rabinowitz didn't hear that only because she chose to ignore it.

    Ms. Rabinowitz has fun trying to diminish my credibility saying I am an "advocate of aromatherapy and regular enemas" and sarcastically says "no one can fail to grasp the wisdom of him who has informed us that if you have happy thoughts you can make happy molecules."

    While I do not claim to be an expert in aromatherapy, there is some useful research that can clarify this issue with research. Aromatherapy has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment modality for anxiety, high blood pressure, fast heart rate, and in modulating immune function. Along with neuroassociative conditioning, it has been used for treating illnesses and for mitigating the harmful side effects of chemotherapy, including nausea and vomiting. See citations below.*

    Therapeutic enemas have been used both in Eastern and Western medical traditions for thousands of years. I must admit I have prescribed enemas to constipated patients, though that can hardly be considered unique for a physician. Perhaps Ms. Rabinowitz is referring to "cleansing enemas" which are also part of many medical traditions, although I am not personally enthusiastic about them.

    It is well documented that when people are having the subjective experience of euphoria or happiness, they generate higher concentrations of serotonin, opiates, oxytocin, and dopamine. These are referred to as the molecules of emotion. These molecules are neurotransmitters but they also act as immunomodulators. Candace Pert, PhD, served as Chief of the Section on Brain Biochemistry of the Clinical Neuroscience Branch of the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) former Chief of Brain Chemistry at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and former Research Professor at Georgetown University School of Medicine. She and her colleagues have done extensive research on these neurotransmitters, and, in fact in her book The Molecules of Emotion, she attests that happy thoughts do indeed make "happy molecules".

    I do not expect Ms. Rabinowitz to know my family history with terrorism, nor do I expect her to know anything about research on traditional, alternative or conventional medicine. But her baseless and reckless pretense that she does know these things, as a means to incite intolerance, is irresponsible and callous.

    In her snickering and condescending manner, Ms. Rabinowitz is suggesting that "I am a snake oil salesman." This tired canard is meant to pull the audience in on the joke that I am some kind of a con artist who doesn't deserve whatever attention I have gained. I am quite familiar with detractors using this ready-made prejudice to try to discredit or diminish me. This strategy is somewhat effective because it appeals to a certain mindset that sees the world in those terms, so I don't expect to disabuse those who are not open to the facts.

    For my part I would simply say that I value practical, verifiable results in medicine as well as in global issues of terrorism. Repeating old failed policies and procedures based on outmoded ideologies makes no sense to me, whether it is political ideology or medical ideology. This creatively pragmatic view for solutions is also thankfully the direction of the future, and we see this especially in the field of medicine now.

    For the record, I am board certified in Internal Medicine, Endocrinology, and Metabolism. I have a license to practice medicine in the states of Massachusetts and California. I am a member of the American Medical Association (AMA), and a Fellow of the American College of Physicians.

    For the last several years, the Chopra Center has offered courses on integrative medicine that have been approved for continuing medical education credit by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education through the joint sponsorship of the University of California, San Diego School of Medicine.

    I'm an adjunct professor at the Kellogg School of Management where I teach a course on leadership.

    Furthermore, once a year I teach at the Update in Internal Medicine, Beth Israel Hospital, Harvard Medical School course where I speak, amongst other things, on aromatherapy and the molecules of emotions.

    Additionally I write columns weekly at Washington Post On Faith and at the San Francisco Chronicle I have been invited to speak at Harvard Business School and Harvard Divinity School as well. Perhaps, Ms. Rabinowitz is unaware of my background or perhaps she simply prefers to create a caricature of me to fit her baseless preconceptions.

    Once a week I host a radio show on Sirus-XM satellite radio. I intend to devote the next few shows to terrorism and creative approaches to it. The next show on Saturday December 6th is a special two hour program live from 12-2pm ET to discuss the cultural, social, and political roots of global terrorism. My next upcoming show will include the following guests: Alan Colmes, of Fox News,Gotham Chopra, Ken Robinson, Peter Bergen, Salman Ahmad, Former Senator Bill Bradley, andShekhar Kapur.

    In the spirit of reconciliation and inclusiveness I am also inviting Ms. Rabinowitz to join in these discussions to offer her solutions to terrorism. I hope she will have the courage to show up.

    Read More:

    Mallika Chopra: What Happened in Mumbai is Very Personal

    Gotham Chopra: My Response to Dorothy Rabinowitz and the WSJ

    Michelle Haimoff: My Uncensored Interview with Deepak Chopra

    Deepak Chopra: Response to the Wall Street Journal

    Deepak Chopra: How to Prevent Another Mumbai

    Gotham Chopra: Mumbai Mess


    *Aromatherapy enhances immune function (Shibata, 1992)
    Aromatherapy reduces need for antidepressant medication in psychiatric patients (Komori, 1995)
    Fragrances can be sedating or activating (Buchbauer, 1993)

    Sirus radio podcasts are available on Intent.com

    Tuesday, November 25, 2008

    Who's In Charge?


    This piece from today's Guardian newspaper in Britain is kind of fun - and somewhat alarming:






    Who's in charge here - Bush or Obama?

    As George Bush doesn't seem to want to be president any more, and Barack Obama can't take over until January, who is running the world's biggest economy at this crucial time?

    The difference between their two most recent news conference could not have been more marked. Outlining his treasury team, Barack Obama looked presidential and raring to go from the moment he walked in and the press rose to their feet.

    George Bush by contrast looked jaded and reluctant to still be in the job as he announced yesterday's bail-out for Citigroup on the steps of the treasury department. He fumbled through the poorly recorded and low-key press conference with Hank Paulson standing awkwardly beside him.

    Is Bush working any more, asked Michael Tomasky. He doesn't seem to want to - referring repeatedly to Obama in his press conference as if it was the president-elect's problem now and not in 60 days' time.

    So does America have two presidents at the moment, or none?

    Earlier this month, Obama refused to go the Washington summit on the financial crisis because he didn't want to tread on Bush's toes.

    "The president-elect will respect the fact that we have one president at a time," his aide said.

    But Obama's behaviour since has suggested he is not respecting that convention, and that he is acting as kind of co-president. Some call it a"split-screen presidency", although he has no formal power until the end of January.

    As Bush "is hardly being president at the moment", others wonder whyObama can't just take over now.










    Friday, November 21, 2008

    A Vision Of Hope by Alexander Chow-Stuart


    The CNN.com news story below, which reflects a report by the NIC (National Intelligence Council) predicting an increasingly unstable and unpredictable future by 2025, and the waning of American power, has been widely reported elsewhere.

    While the world clearly faces extraordinary challenges in virtually every regard right now, whether it be financial instability,  dwindling natural resources, global warming, poverty or domestic and international conflict, the words "thus it ever was" come to mind.

    I remember reading media accounts of intelligence reports in the 1970s that predicted worldwide chaos and increasing violence by now, and while sadly there is always evidence of instability and violence, I am not sure that things are so much worse now than they were in the 1970s or certainly the 1930s.

    The NIC, like any intelligence agency or any think-tank, has a job to do and its own existence to justify, and while I am no pie-in-the-sky idealist, I do believe that what President-Elect Obama brought to the recent election, and will bring to the White House, is an overwhelming sense of hope: the "Audacity of Hope," to quote the title of one of his books.

    If we focus on the negative, as we largely have for the past eight years, we are encouraged to live in fear and to temper our ambitions and our dreams.

    If we live in hope, it doesn't mean that we deny the existence of the problems that surround us, but that we believe that we will find solutions, that together we will find greater strength, that if necessary we will shift our energy and food and manufacturing production into new directions - because we have to - and that while we may make mistakes initially, and while the balance of power, both political and financial, may change, ultimately we will make the right choices.

    It is important that our new president be meticulously informed of the state of the world and of possible scenarios of the future, but my own hope is that Barack Obama doesn't lose his inspiring and empowering sense of hope amid the many challenges he will face as President and Commander in Chief.

    He excited vast numbers of people - a 52% popular majority of the voters of this nation, as well as countless numbers of others around the globe - by offering, for the first time in memory, a political agenda based on a belief in our innate strengths and goodness as human beings.

    As the parent of one young child, with another due in January, I pray for them and for all of us that President Obama's vision of the future will be achieved, that we will meet whatever challenges or disasters or attacks or dramatic changes in circumstance that may occur with ingenuity and imagination, with a faith in humankind and a belief that we can cherish our planet and build a better world for our children.

    In the midst of the late 1930s and early 1940s in England, while Hitler was pressing Germany into an horrific war, and even as he served personally as a "watchman" during the Blitz of German bombers over London during that war, an American-born poet, T S Eliot, wrote one of the world's most beautiful and most spiritual books, reflecting on time, love, life, death, impermanence and permanence, and spirituality at its most sublime: Four Quartets.

    As the world was falling into what appeared to be a vortex of destruction, Eliot wrote, among many other astonishingly beautiful passages:

    "At the still point of the turning world.  Neither flesh nor
    fleshless;
    Neither from nor towards; at the still point, there the dance
    is...and there is only the dance."

    Let us all make it our responsibility each day to focus at least for a few moments on that still point and to hold to it - hold to the possibility of peace, both inner and outer, in this world, and of our role in this life as something to be honored and cherished and to be grateful for.

    Let us continue to live in hope.