I wish that every human life might be pure transparent freedom - Simone de Beauvoir

Note: If this page opens on my post, A Vision of Hope, please click on the blog title, Loving The Wolf, for the latest updates.

I don't have time to update my blog very often, so please check my Twitter Feed below.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    Tuesday, May 25, 2010

    BP's Disaster In The Gulf - and President Obama's Challenge

    Fascinating Huffington Post article about the challenge facing President Obama with the truly catastrophic BP oil spill.  The need for a Plan B (but not Plan BP!) seems obvious - but who apart from an oil company has the technical knowledge or equipment to solve the problem (aside from legal issues arising from the Exxon Valdez disaster that place responsibility firmly in the hands of the oil companies)?

    We should never again allow deepwater drilling until (a) there is an adequate governmental response available in terms of expertise and equipment; and (b) there is no cap whatsoever on the liability of the oil companies should a disaster such as this occur.

    My heart bleeds for the Gulf and surrounding lands - I hope that BP is still paying for this in thirty years' time, because the environmental effects will last easily that long.


    Obama To Aides: 'Plug The Damn Hole'

    AP/Huffington Post First Posted: 05-25-10 10:47 AM   |   Updated: 05-25-10 11:35 AM


    WHAT'S YOUR REACTION?
    115
    984views
    Obama Gulf Oil Leak
    WASHINGTON (AP) -- Oil spill frustration is rampant.
    The White House is being pounded for not acting more aggressively in the month-old oil spill disaster in the Gulf of Mexico. The administration is hitting back, mostly at BP. Louisiana is threatening to take matters into its own hands. The truth is, the government has little direct experience at either the national or state level at stopping deepwater oil leaks - and few realistic options.
    With the oil flowing and spreading at a furious rate, President Barack Obama has accused BP of a "breakdown of responsibility." He named a special independent commission to review what happened.
    But the administration seems to want to have it both ways - insisting it's in charge while also insisting that BP do the heavy lifting. The White House is arguing that government officials aren't just watching from the sidelines, but also acknowledging there's just so much the government can do directly.
    "[T]o those tasked with keeping the president apprised of the disaster," the Washington Postreported, "Obama's clenched jaw is becoming an increasingly familiar sight. During one of those sessions in the Oval Office the first week after the spill, a president who rarely vents his frustration cut his aides short, according to one who was there. 'Plug the damn hole,' Obama told them."
    "They are 5,000 feet down. BP or the private sector alone have the means to deal with that problem down there. It's not government equipment that is going to be used to do that," Coast Guard Commandant Thad Allen told a White House briefing on Monday.
    "They are the responsible party. But we have the authority to direct them," he added.
    There are political risks both ways. If the federal government took control somehow, it would own the problem and any failure would belong to Obama.
    But the flip side is that Obama could suffer politically if his administration is seen as falling short of staying on top of the problem or not working hard to find a solution.
    In the past, the government has turned to oil industry experts to deal with oil disasters.
    It famously recruited legendary oil well fighters Paul N. "Red" Adair and Edward "Coots" Matthews to help in the first Iraq war. Retreating Iraqi troops deliberately spilled 462 million gallons of oil into the Persian Gulf and set more than 700 oilfield fires.
    After the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska, Congress dictated in the 1990 Oil Pollution Act that oil companies be responsible for dealing with major accidents - including paying for all cleanup - with oversight by federal agencies.
    That has pretty much been the model ever since. And the administration insists that's exactly what it is doing - although clearly not everyone agrees.
    Anger grows as the slick spreads and washes ashore into environmentally sensitive marshes and waterways. Nerves are frayed and finger-pointing in full swing.
    The administration says it is losing patience with BP PLC's efforts.
    "If we find they're not doing what they're supposed to be doing, we'll push them out of the way appropriately," Interior Secretary Ken Salazar told reporters outside BP's headquarters in Houston on Sunday.
    Just what did Salazar mean by "push them out of the way"? Officials have struggled since in explaining.
    "That's more of a metaphor," the Coast Guard's Allen said Monday. "'Push BP out of the way' would raise the question - replace them with what?"
    Allen, responsible for oversight of the spill response, said he's frustrated too, along with other Americans.
    Salazar and Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano led a Senate delegation to the region Monday.
    "We are going to stay on this and stay on BP until this gets done and it gets done the right way," Napolitano said after flying over the affected area.
    Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, a Republican, has taken swipes at BP and other oil companies involved in the disaster as well as the federal government. Jindal said he was going to call out members of the Louisiana National Guard to join state wildlife and fisheries agents to supplement a federal response he called inadequate.
    In particular, Jindal assailed the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for failing to sign off on a plan to build a chain of protective sand barriers - or berms - off the coast to help block the oil.
    "We are not waiting for them. We are going to build it" ourselves, Jindal said. U.S. officials say the Corps is nearing a final decision.
    The spill began April 20 after the Deepwater Horizon rig owned by driller Transocean and leased by BP exploded, killing 11 workers. Millions of gallons of oil have spewed from the blown well.
    Doug Suttles, chief operating officer at BP PLC, made the round of network news shows Monday with the same message: "We are doing everything we can, everything I know." He said the energy giant, formerly known as British Petroleum, understands and shares everyone's frustration.
    But history isn't encouraging when it comes to underwater ruptures.
    The last major spill in the Gulf was in June 1979, when an offshore drilling rig in Mexican waters - the Ixtoc I - blew up, releasing 140 million gallons of oil. The well was owned by Mexico's state oil company, known as Pemex. It took Pemex and a series of U.S. contractors nearly nine months to cap the well, and a great deal of the oil contaminated Mexican and U.S. waters.
    If patience is necessary, it isn't a particularly forthcoming quality in these tense times.
    Even as strong an Obama ally as Democratic consultant James Carville has been taking shots at the administration.
    A Louisiana native, Carville told CNN the administration was "risking everything by this 'go along with BP' strategy. ... If you let BP handle it ... it's not going to go away. It is a disaster of the first magnitude and they've got to go to Plan B."
    But so far, there was no Plan B on the table short of waiting until August, when two relief wells are expected to reach the oil deep under the ocean floor.

    Tuesday, May 18, 2010

    Christoph Niemann's Lego New York

    For friends from New York - and everyone who loves one of the world's greatest cities - here are three of artist Christoph Niemann's tributes to the Big ..um..Lego, also now available in book form for you to hold in your very own hands (the book, not the Lego).

    Sunday, May 16, 2010

    Toxic Chemical Fear Over BP's Clean-up Efforts

    As someone who, as a child, wanted to be a marine biologist, watching the BP/Transocean/Halliburton oil spill disaster in the Gulf of Mexico is immensely painful and depressing...not least when BP's CEO Tony Hayward said, with remarkable stupidity or disingenuousness, that the Gulf is a large ocean (it is not; I live by the Pacific - that is a large ocean) and the spill was small in comparison.

    This report from the Observer, which references the toxic chemicals being used in an attempt to disperse the gushing oil underwater, is equally depressing.  One of the attempted "solutions" may be as bad as the problem, affecting everything from plankton and other microscopic marine life to dolphins, whales, fish and seabirds. not to mention the livelihoods of those who depend on fishing the Gulf.

    We should all remember that it is not simply oil fouling the beautiful wetlands and beaches of the Gulf states that is at stake here - it is the entire ecological chain that starts on the floor of the ocean and reaches to the top.  We really need to find an alternative to our dependence on oil - and we really need to regulate the oil companies to an extent at least comparable to the size of this ecological disaster.


    Louisiana oil spill: toxic chemical fear over BP's clean-up efforts

    Officials, scientists and fishermen warn of threat to sealife in the Gulf of Mexico


    Massive Oil Slick Reaches Louisiana Gulf Coast
    Chemical dispersant spreads after being released into the Gulf of Mexico this month. Photograph: Joe Raedle/Getty Images
    Scientists have raised urgent new concerns over the latest efforts to mitigate the catastrophic oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico caused by the oil rig explosion on BP's Deepwater Horizon. Latest efforts to limit the environmental damage involve an untried deep-water technique, using a toxic dispersant that they believe may damage ocean life. But the new method has so far only succeeded in ratcheting up the growing controversy surrounding the spill.
    On Friday, Barack Obama appeared to be losing his patience with oil company executives and officials who have been trading blame since the rig exploded. "I will not tolerate more finger-pointing or irresponsibility," he said in the White House rose garden, flanked by members of his cabinet. "The system failed, and it failed badly. And for that, there is enough responsibility to go around. And all parties should be willing to accept it."
    Approval by the US Environment Protection Agency (EPA) for the pumping of tens of thousands of litres of the chemical Corexit 9500 deep on to the seabed early yesterday comes despite warnings fromLouisiana state health officials, scientists and fishermen that the technique is untested and potentially hazardous to marine life and the wider ecosystem. Louisiana officials claim BP and the EPA ignored their concerns about how the chemicals may harm the sea floor.
    This round of attempts to both stop the spill and deal with the oil being spewed out follow the failure to capture the leak by the lowering of a 100-tonne metal box over the damaged seabed wellhead.
    In the coming days BP will attempt a "junk shot". This involves pumping the damaged blow-out preventer lying on the ocean floor – which failed during the explosion that killed 11 workers – with golf balls and other material to clog it up before closing it with heavy mud.
    But it is the use of the chemical dispersant in such depths that has become the increasing focus of concern. Until now, Corexit 9500 has been approved for surface use only.
    Chemical dispersants break oil into small globules, allowing it to disperse more quickly into the water or air before currents can wash it ashore.
    Corexit 9500 has been identified as a "moderate" human health hazard that can cause eye, skin or respiratory irritation with prolonged exposure. Its makers also warn that it has the tendency to "bioconcentrate" in the environment.
    Louisiana health and hospitals secretary Alan Levine said federal regulators have been too quick to dismiss worries about the chemicals: "Our concerns about the use of these dispersants underwater is based on the fact that there is virtually no science that supports the use of those chemicals. We're trading off what we know is going to be environmental damage on the surface for environmental damage of a level we don't know that is going to be under the surface."
    Carys Mitchelmore, an environmental chemist at the University of Maryland Centre for Environmental Science and a co-author of a 2005 US National Academies report on dispersants, told Nature: "No one will tell you using dispersants won't have an effect. You're trading one species for another. The long-term effects are really unknown. The dispersant has inherent toxicity. And these oil droplets tend to be the same size as food particles for filter-feeding organisms."
    "Dispersants… are toxic to marine life, so there are trade-offs to consider," David Pettit of the Natural Resources Defence Council told theWashington Post last week. "And just because humans can't see oil on the surface doesn't mean it's not still in the water column, affecting marine life from plankton to whales."
    Another toxiciology expert, Dr William Sawyer, who has made a presentation to the US lawyers representing environmental and other interests after the spill has added to the concern: "The dispersants used in the BP clean-up efforts, known as Corexit 9500 and Corexit EC9527A, are also known as deodorized kerosene," he told the group. "With respect to marine toxicity and potential human health risks, studies of kerosene exposures strongly indicate potential health risks to volunteers, workers, sea turtles, dolphins, breathing reptiles and all species which need to surface for air exchanges, as well as birds and all other mammals. Additionally, I have considered marine species which surface for atmospheric inhalation such as sea turtles, dolphins and other species which are especially vulnerable to aspiration toxicity of Corexit 9500 into the lung while surfacing."
    Meanwhile, concern was mounting that substantial slicks of oil might be on the point of reaching Louisiana's fragile marshlands. TV footage late on Friday from a helicopter flight over Louisiana's barrier islands showed miles of slick being washed by waves through wide passes between islands directly toward the wetlands of Terrebonne Parish.