I wish that every human life might be pure transparent freedom - Simone de Beauvoir

Note: If this page opens on my post, A Vision of Hope, please click on the blog title, Loving The Wolf, for the latest updates.

I don't have time to update my blog very often, so please check my Twitter Feed below.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    Tuesday, September 30, 2008

    Proof That People Should Analyze And Anticipate More Rather Than Simply Follow




    House Members Get Angry Calls on Rescue Plan Defeat, Aide Says 

    By James Rowley

    Sept. 30 (Bloomberg) -- Voters flooded Capitol Hill offices today with complaints that the U.S. House defeated the $700 billion financial-rescue plan, a House Republican leadership aide said.

    The tenor of the calls is a reversal from an earlier outpouring of voter opposition to the bailout legislation, the aide said.

    To contact the reporter on this story: James Rowley in Washington at jarowley@bloomberg.net.

    Last Updated: September 30, 2008 13:33 EDT


    Monday, September 29, 2008

    New Growth In The Forest


    I got up around 3:00am today to write and took a quick look at Bloomberg.com (great iPhone application and a great source of really essential news) and, boy, does it seem like we are in a mess.

    The $700 billion bailout package has made great progress, but House Republicans may yet vote it down (thanks for the stellar spanner in the works last week, Mr McCain).  I don't like it any more than anyone else, but if you look at the world's financial markets - not just ours - it is crystal clear that something needs to be done fast.

    Just today the British Government partially nationalized a collapsing building society, Bradford and Bingley (something between a US credit union and a bank), while governments in Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg guaranteed an 11.2 billion Euros ($16.3 billion) lifeline to Fortis, a major European bank that is also at great risk of collapse.  Meanwhile, Germany guaranteed 35 billion Euros ($50 billion) to Hypo, a major German real estate company.  And trading in Dexia SA, a major lender based in both Brussels and Paris, fell as much as 33%.  Last week there was a run on a bank in Hong Kong.

    Add to this the highly perceptive Warren Buffet's warning that the United States - and the world - are facing a financial crisis of unprecedented magnitude (Buffet also warned of 3 million Americans losing their jobs in a matter of weeks if the Congressional/Treasury bailout package is not passed), and the old Laurel and Hardy line, "Another fine mess you've gotten me into," seems more than apt right now.

    I do not believe the sky will fall.  I am old enough and have been through enough, including the loss of a five year old son to cancer, to know that (to use another cliche), "Tomorrow is another day."  But we should all ask ourselves just how did we get here and what can we do - each of us - to help get us out of this chaos?

    If you scroll down a couple of entries on this blog, you will find a Buddhist quotation about how we perceive the moment too much as a conglomeration of all that has been, all we have done, our memories, emotion, anger, frustration, etc - instead of viewing it as an opportunity to create the future.

    I think now is a very good time to think about the strength of nature.  Think about a fallen tree in the forest: if its roots remain, new growth will sprout up.  We all have to be those fresh green shoots right now, drawing on the past (drawing lessons from it, particularly) but reaching skyward toward sunlight and fresh air.

    We will all survive.  And even in a crisis, life is beautiful.

    Sunday, September 28, 2008

    Last Year's Predictions For 2008: Fed Liquidity and Bank Collapse


    I came across these predictions for 2008 that I made back in December of last year for Public Radio International's excellent daily news program, The World (coproduced with the BBC).

    I may have placed too much emphasis on water, although water wars (at the very least of the trade variety) lie in our future for sure, and I only predicted one major US bank collapse - who knew?  Interesting to see if the $700 billion bailout will help stabilize the US housing market by the end of the year.

    And I truly, truly pray that Mr Barack Obama (who I think has more than a touch of FDR about him) is headed for the White House in January 2009, just as our new daughter is about to be born...although hopefully she will be born first, as her due date is early in the month:-)









    Posted at 12/12/2007 4:37:34 PM in What insights and predictions do you have for 2008?

    Re: What insights and predictions do you have for 2008?

    China will increasingly - and very quietly - buy natural resources from other countries. (I believe that they already own large expanses of Canada's fresh water.) 

    China will also, along with other Asian and Middle Eastern countries, purchase large stakes in Western financial institutions. If regulation permits it, China could own at least one major US bank by the end of 2008. 

    Water, as others have noted, will become an increasingly precious commodity - perhaps the most precious commodity, ultimately. 

    The Euro will at least match the dollar's influence in world markets. China in particular will diversify its foreign currency holdings to a far greater extent. 

    The US housing market will reach relative stability by the end of 2008, but only after huge injections of liquidity from the Fed and probably the collapse of at least one major US bank. 

    Iraq will hopefully achieve a degree of stability for its people - but only if the US can accept some kind of diplomatic rapprochement with Iran. 

    A Democrat, I pray, will be headed to the White House. And one with the strength and compassion to restore the sense of hope that the US had under Clinton's presidency.

    Friday, September 26, 2008

    Conservatives Say Palin Should Step Down As Candidate


    This from CNN.  Now even conservative critics are calling for Palin to step down as vice-presidential candidate, citing that she clearly lacks the necessary credentials and experience:

    September 26, 2008
    Posted: 03:27 PM ET

    From 
    Palin was in New York City Thursday.
    Palin was in New York City Thursday.

    (CNN) – Prominent conservative columnist Kathleen Parker, an early supporter of Republican VP candidate Sarah Palin, said Friday recent interviews have shown the Alaska governor is "out of her league" and should leave the GOP presidential ticket for the good of the party.

    The criticism in Parker's Friday column is the latest in a recent string of negative assessments toward the McCain-Palin candidacy from prominent conservatives.

    It was fun while it lasted," Parker writes. "Palin’s recent interviews with Charles Gibson, Sean Hannity, and now Katie Couric have all revealed an attractive, earnest, confident candidate. Who is clearly out of her league."

    Palin's interview with Couric drew criticism when the Alaska governor was unable to provide an example of when John McCain had pushed for more regulation of Wall Street during his Senate career. Palin also took heat for defending her foreign policy credentials by suggesting Russian leaders enter Alaska airspace when they come to America. Palin was also criticized last week for appearing not to know what the Bush Doctrine is during an interview with Charlie Gibson.

    “If BS were currency, Palin could bail out Wall Street herself," Parker also writes. "If Palin were a man, we’d all be guffawing, just as we do every time Joe Biden tickles the back of his throat with his toes. But because she’s a woman — and the first ever on a Republican presidential ticket — we are reluctant to say what is painfully true."

    Parker, who praised McCain's "keen judgment" for picking Palin earlier this month and wrote the Alaska governor is a "perfect storm of God, Mom and apple pie," now says Palin should step down from the ticket.

    “Only Palin can save McCain, her party, and the country she loves," Parker writes. She can bow out for personal reasons, perhaps because she wants to spend more time with her newborn. No one would criticize a mother who puts her family first. Do it for your country."

    Parker's comments follow those by prominent conservatives David BrooksGeorge Will,and David Frum who have all publicly questioned Palin's readiness to be vice president.

    "Sarah Palin has many virtues," Brooks wrote in a recent column. "If you wanted someone to destroy a corrupt establishment, she'd be your woman. But the constructive act of governance is another matter. She has not been engaged in national issues, does not have a repertoire of historic patterns and, like President Bush, she seems to compensate for her lack of experience with brashness and excessive decisiveness."

    Thursday, September 25, 2008

    Create The Future


    A few words of peace and calm in the surface chaos of the tiny little bubble we call our lives.







    Tricycle's Daily Dharma

    An Opportunity to Create the Future

    It is a characteristic tendency of human beings to indulge in emotions such as happiness, grief, or anger in response to present conditions, failing to balance these feelings with the awareness that present conditions are results of past causes. It is illogical to face the present only as an object of enjoyment or tolerance, neglecting to use it as the opportunity to create the future.


    --Muso Kokushi, in Dream Conversations
    from Everyday Mind, edited by Jean Smith, a Tricycle book


    Visit Tricycle: The Buddhist Review at:http://www.tricycle.com

    Subscribe to Tricycle online: click here

    Wednesday, September 24, 2008

    McCain's Proposal To Postpone The First Debate


    John McCain is the most opportunistic two-faced ****er on the planet right now with his sudden "concern" for government regulation and his call to postpone Friday's presidential debate.

    This is a man whose campaign advisors number among them more lobbyists than a Republican golfing trip (not to mention those until recently on the payroll of Freddie Mac) and a man who for almost thirty years has fought for deregulation of just about anything you could name.

    Is he perhaps just a little afraid of a debate, with his poll numbers falling and the campaign shifting onto territory that is by no means his strongest ground?

    The economic crisis is real, but McCain's party and the policies he supports largely created it.  He should debate Barack Obama on Friday night and let the public decide who is best equipped to lead this country at a time when so many people - and I'm not talking about investment bankers - are really hurting.

    Tuesday, September 23, 2008

    Americans Favor Obama To Handle Market Crisis


    This from Bloomberg.com, an excellent source of news of all kinds, not just financial:

    Americans Oppose Bailouts, Favor Obama to Handle Market Crisis 

    By Matthew Benjamin

    Sept. 24 (Bloomberg) -- Americans oppose government rescues of ailing financial companies by a decisive margin, and blame Wall Street and President George W. Bush for the credit crisis.

    By a margin of 55 percent to 31 percent, Americans say it's not the government's responsibility to bail out private companies with taxpayer dollars, even if their collapse could damage the economy, according to the latest Bloomberg/Los Angeles Times poll.

    Poll respondents say Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama would do a better job handling the financial crisis than Republican John McCain, by a margin of 45 percent to 33 percent. Almost half of voters say the Democrat has better ideas to strengthen the economy than his Republican opponent.

    Six weeks before the presidential election, almost 80 percent of Americans say the U.S. is going in the wrong direction, the biggest percentage since the poll began asking that question in 1991.

    After market chaos this month drove Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. into bankruptcy and prompted federal takeovers of American International Group Inc.Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, most survey respondents said financial companies shouldn't expect taxpayers to rush to the rescue.

    ``Why should we help companies that can't help themselves?'' Tara Rook, 36, a Republican voter in Medford, New Jersey, asked in a follow-up interview. ``The government is getting way too involved with private companies.''

    No Bailouts

    Almost two out of three people surveyed also oppose government loans to help automakers. Congress is set to vote on a bill this month that includes $25 billion in low-interest loans to General Motors Corp.Ford Motor Co. and Chrysler LLC to develop more fuel-efficient vehicles.

    In spite of opposition to government intervention in the private sector, Congress is likely to pass legislation to let the Treasury buy distressed assets from troubled financial institutions. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson says a $700 billion rescue plan is needed to revive credit markets.

    Public resistance to bailouts, however, may strengthen the position of lawmakers who want to put significant conditions on the plan, such as limiting executive pay at participating companies, and letting bankruptcy judges modify mortgages for struggling borrowers.

    Caveats, Conditions

    ``While there are misgivings and concerns, ultimately the Congress will go along -- not simply with the bailout plan, but also with insisting on some add-ons, some caveats and some conditions which the White House will ultimately have to accept,'' saidKenneth Duberstein, former chief of staff to President Ronald Reagan.

    A poll by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, asking a different question, found that Americans, by 57-30 percent, favored government action to save financial companies.

    The Pew poll told respondents that the government is ``potentially investing billions to try and keep financial institutions and markets secure'' and asked whether that's the right thing to do. The Bloomberg/Los Angeles Times poll asked whether ``the government should use taxpayers' dollars to rescue ailing private financial firms whose collapse could have adverse effects on the economy and market, or is it not the government's responsibility to bail out private companies with taxpayers' dollars?''

    Lax Regulation

    More than 60 percent respondents to the Bloomberg/Los Angeles Times poll say lack of regulation is partly responsible for the financial and housing crises, while 24 percent say that wasn't the problem.

    Asked who is to blame for the collapse of financial institutions like Lehman Brothers and AIG, nearly a third of Americans blame the firms themselves. One-quarter say the Bush administration is primarily responsible. Only 11 percent point fingers at Congress.

    ``I blame Wall Street,'' said Cindy Crick, of Flower Mound, Texas. ``The salaries are ridiculous, the bonuses are ridiculous,'' the 52-year-old paralegal and Republican voter said. ``It's greed, and it makes them willing to bend the rules.''

    On the Wrong Track

    Americans are extremely pessimistic about the state of the nation. Eight in 10 people say the country is seriously off on the wrong track. Concern about the country's direction crosses party lines, shared by 83 percent of political independents, 90 percent of Democrats and 60 percent of Republicans.

    Eight in 10 respondents say the economy is doing badly, and more than half say it's doing very badly. Seven in 10 of those with annual incomes above $100,000 say the economy's in bad shape, along with almost nine in 10 of those earning between $40,000 and $100,000, and eight in 10 of those making less than $40,000.

    The Sept. 19-22 poll of 1,428 adults nationwide had a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.

    Half of those interviewed say they feel less financially secure now than they did six months ago -- four times the number who say they feel more secure.

    `Everything's More Expensive'

    Gasoline prices are the biggest source of anxiety for Dave Masemer in Nashville, Tennessee. The 52-year-old meat buyer says high fuel costs hurt business for him and his customers. ``Everything's more expensive, gas has jumped $3 a gallon, it affects everything,'' Masemer, a Democratic voter, said.

    The average price for a gallon of regular unleaded gasoline is $3.73, according to AAA. That's down from a peak of $4.11 in mid-July, but 92 cents higher than a year ago.

    Among economic issues in the presidential campaign, respondents most often cited rising gasoline prices and stronger regulation of financial institutions as their most important concerns. More than one-fifth of Americans picked each of those issues. Only 7 percent say taxes are the top issue.

    To contact the reporter on this story: Matthew Benjamin in Washington at mbenjamin2@bloomberg.net.

    Last Updated: September 23, 2008 17:01 EDT

    Sunday, September 21, 2008

    Obama Overtakes McCain


    This from Sunday's Observer newspaper in Britain:

    US elections 2008

    Wall St woes help Obama overtake McCain express

    With Palin mania ebbing away, the Republican campaign looks suddenly vulnerable after a string of serious gaffes. A tumultuous week on the financial front and a drift of women voters back to Obama have eroded McCain's gains and made the election once more too close to call. The Democrats are now fighting on a ground of their own choosing - the economy

     Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama

    Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama. Photograph: Bob Brown/AP

    The opening was superbly choreographed. To the sound of thundering rock music blaring from speakers, several thousand people watched as John McCain's campaign plane swooped out of the sparkling blue Iowa skies.

    The plane taxied to a halt only 100 metres away from the crowd gathered at an airport outside the city of Cedar Rapids. They cheered wildly as McCain and his running mate, Sarah Palin, descended from the aircraft and trooped through the throng, smiling and shaking hands.

    Then things started to go wrong. 'Thank you so much, Iowa. It's great to be here in Grand Rapids,' Palin said as she took the stage, naming a completely different city in the far-off state of Michigan. 'CEDAR Rapids!' came shouts from the crowd. Palin ignored her gaffe and ploughed on with a speech that was quickly interrupted by anti-war protesters. For several minutes the hangar was filled with shouts and chants, drowning out the Alaska governor's words. Then McCain took the stage, and the same thing happened to him, forcing him off his script to address an unruly scrimmage as security hauled out the shouting demonstrators. 'The one thing Americans want us to do is stop yelling at each other,' McCain said in exasperation.

    Suddenly, after hauling his campaign back into contention for the White House, the wheels are starting to come off McCain's fabled Straight Talk Express. The gaffe-ridden rally in Cedar Rapids was only one indication. In a week of almost unprecedented economic crisis, when Wall Street seemed on the brink of meltdown, McCain's presidential bid was hit by mistake after mistake, varying from the serious to the surreal.

    As stocks dropped off a precipice, McCain said the economic fundamentals were strong. Then a senior aide seemed to suggest McCain had invented the BlackBerry. His top economic adviser, Carly Fiorina, confessed she thought neither McCain nor Palin was capable of running a large company. Then, in the middle of the worst financial collapse since the 1930s, McCain got the public endorsement of Donald Trump, a celebrity tycoon who symbolises raw capitalism. For a candidate trying to strike a populist tone, the backing of 'the Donald' was poorly timed. 'It's like a Saturday Night Live routine,' quipped rival Barack Obama on a campaign stop in Nevada.

    At the same time the remarkable surge of support inspired by Palin seems to be ebbing. Polls show women voters drifting back to Obama, who has established a slim lead again. Palin is increasingly mired in the 'Troopergate' scandal related to allegations that she fired a senior official out of a personal grudge against her sister's former partner. Palin's star, which shone so brightly for two weeks and reinvigorated the Republican base, is showing every sign of dimming. But the real problem is the biggest one: the stunning economic rollercoaster of last week. Americans in their tens of millions have been glued to their TV screens watching banks collapse, stocks slide and their own government pump billions of dollars into the system to bail out troubled banks and insurers. It has turned the election right back to the core issue that Democrats have wanted to talk about all along: the economy and its terrible woes. McCain, with the first presidential debate looming this week, is now fighting the election on his opponent's strongest turf. In an America shaken and scared by the spectre of a second Great Depression, no one is talking about pigs, lipstick or moose-hunting any more.

    But McCain is nothing if not a fighter. In Cedar Rapids he came out blazing against Wall Street, reckless investors and the regulators who let them place such risky bets. His speech was full of fiery language as he vowed to sack government officials, defend US workers and clean up Washington DC. 'Right now you are hurting and it is not your fault,' he told the crowd of several thousand packed into an aircraft hangar. 'It started at the top. It started in Washington. It started on Wall Street and we are going to fix it.'

    The crowd dutifully cheered its support, swinging behind this new image of McCain as a man of the people. The applause lines just kept on coming. 'They turned our markets into a casino,' McCain added, to more cheers. 'The regulators were asleep at the switch. They were asleep, my friends. They were not working for you,' he said. It seemed to work, too, though only with an all-Republican crowd that had long bought into his message. 'I am very excited about this. McCain right now is the best thing for this country,' said Harry Meek, owner of a local Iowa pest management company, who had driven more than 100 miles to get to the rally.

    Outside the confines of a friendly Republican crowd, McCain's message is likely to meet greater resistance. For many years, McCain has been an outspoken advocate of easing restrictions on Wall Street, not tightening regulations. His campaign is closely linked to lobbyists and the financial industry is a huge donator to his cause. That has allowed Obama's speechwriters to hurl some sharply worded barbs. 'The old boys' network? In the McCain campaign, that's called a staff meeting,' is one of Obama's most popular lines in his current stump speech.

    At the same time McCain is facing an American electorate likely to blame eight years living under a Republican White House for the current mess. The words that McCain never mentions on the campaign trail are 'President George W Bush'. In effect, McCain has to run against what his own Republican party has done for the last two presidential terms, almost turning his campaign into a third party. But the Bush legacy is still likely to cast a deep shadow over his efforts. 'It is hard for his message to ring true: "If you elect me I will finally clean up Washington, having been there for 30 years",' said Professor Seth Masket, a political scientist at Denver University. 'It is a really hard needle to thread.'

    The economy is not the ground on which McCain wanted to fight the election. His line last week that 'the fundamentals of our economy are strong' was the latest in a long list of verbal mistakes he has made over economic issues. The subject has been a weak one for Republicans ever since the Bush administration turned a surplus into a massive deficit and jobless figures started creeping up.

    A recent Washington Post poll found that people preferred Obama on the economy by 51 per cent to 39 per cent. Almost three-quarters of people said Obama understood their economic problems, compared with only 53 per cent who thought McCain felt that way. Certainly McCain's recent successes in the polls have not been built on his economic image. Instead they were boosted by a tough, disciplined message machine that had successfully torn into Obama's image and accused him of being elitist, liberal and sexist. But now that apparatus of attack is starting to splutter too. Reporters on McCain's campaign plane recently staged a protest against a decision to cut off access to McCain. They chanted 'Bring Mac back!' as they sat in their plane seats. The demonstration had little impact but showed how broken relations have become with the press corps that once fawned upon the candidate.

    At the same time, the hard-edged anti-Obama attacks have become so extreme that many commentators have accused the campaign of outright lies. Even the conservative Fox News channel joined the debate when one of its anchors publicly ripped into a senior McCain spokesman on air for misrepresenting Obama's tax plans.

    Finally, to add to the misery, there has been a slew of negative news about Palin. After first promising to co-operate in the Troopergate investigation in Alaska, she has now refused to testify. So has her husband, Todd. The McCain campaign is taking the whole issue so seriously that it has dispatched a rapid response team to Alaska to rebut the regular new revelations emerging from the state. The effort is being directed by lawyer Edward O'Callaghan, a McCain aide who was previously a terrorist expert. Polls have shown that the story has damaged Palin, and a carefully planned media rollout, via a series of TV interviews, has done little to blunt it. After massive swings in her direction after her stunning debut at the Republican convention, the pendulum of popularity has started to reverse course. Last week one poll showed Palin registering an 11-point drop in support among women. Another showed white women voters going back to Obama by a margin of 21 points. Not that anyone could tell that from Palin's performance in Iowa. When not shouting over the noise of protesters, she doggedly delivered her trademark speech, complete with introduction of her husband as 'First Dude' and touting her experience as a 'mom'. She exuded confidence and kept up the barrage of attacks on Obama. 'He likes to point the finger of blame,' she said of the Democratic candidate 'But has he ever really lifted a finger to help?'

    The message is aimed at people like Ron Eversman and small towns like Newton, Iowa. Eversman, a baker, was sitting last week in the neat square at the heart of Newton, a town surrounded by cornfields and reeling from the closure of a factory and the loss of hundreds of jobs. It is a story repeated all over America and uppermost in voters' minds. Eversman had watched the events on Wall Street unfolding with a mixture of fear and grim fascination. 'It sure isn't good, is it? I have a little investment and it has taken a beating,' he said.

    Eversman had good news for Obama. He plans to vote for him. 'McCain is too much like Bush. He's better than Bush, of course. But I want something different.' But it would be a mistake to think the Democrats have the support of Eversman - and millions of worried voters like him - sewn up. Eversman admitted that he could change his mind by November. 'I don't think Obama is any kind of saviour or anything,' he said with a shrug.

    The economic crisis holds many pitfalls for Obama too. His style and rhetoric have been based on lofty idealism and inspiration. That created an astonishing political movement, based on young voters, black people and the well educated. But, as Hillary Clinton showed in the final weeks of her nomination run, Obama is vulnerable to a candidate who can tap into the deep concerns of working-class white America. His choice of Joe Biden as a running mate was meant to solve the issue, but so far the Delaware senator has had little impact, apart from developing a long line of mistakes, including opining that Clinton might have been a better choice. Obama himself might have trouble striking a populist tone, too. As the first black candidate of a major party, his staff is aware that he cannot afford to be portrayed as the 'angry black' candidate. His appeal is based on unity, good governance and an attempt to be 'post-racial'.

    Like McCain, he has been hit by some unfortunate events in the past week. Both campaigns seem to be expert at attacking each other and less good at their own performance. First, Biden called for rich people to pay more taxes as their patriotic duty. That comment was co-opted into McCain's speech literally within hours. 'Raising taxes in a tough economy is not patriotic. It is not a badge of honour. It is just plain dumb,' McCain said in Cedar Rapids, getting the biggest cheer of the rally.

    Then Obama was hit by the fund-raising needs of his campaign. As the economic crisis sloshed over the country, he held a celebrity-studded event in California, at which Barbra Streisand sang. The cost for a ticket was a staggering $28,500(£15,500). Obama was ruthlessly mocked on the late-night talk shows. 'All the big Hollywood stars were there... I believe the topic was how John McCain is out of touch with the common people,' quipped TV host Jay Leno.

    But there is little doubt that the Democrats are now much happier to be fighting this election on economic issues. The past few weeks of 'Palin mania' threw them off balance. Now it has put their campaign where it always wanted to be: attacking McCain directly and making it about serious issues. The airwaves are full of Obama ads portraying McCain as out of touch and Obama as in tune with the needs of ordinary people. They even include a two-minute advert in which Obama outlines his economic agenda. 'That's a pretty amazing ad to be running. It shows how serious people are taking this,' said Masket. On the stump last week Obama launched salvo after salvo in McCain's direction. 'What we've seen the last few days is nothing less than the final verdict on an economic philosophy that has completely failed,' he said at a Colorado rally. The Democrats are sensing their chance again. The polls bear them out. They are back in the game. Obama has re-established a small but solid lead in recent surveys. The RCP average of polls has him two points ahead of McCain. In the key battleground states things are tight again.

    A week ago all the buzz was about McCain closing the gap in Democratic strongholds like New York and New Jersey. Now the stress is on Obama's growing strength in red states like Virginia, Colorado and North Carolina. With seven weeks to go, the election is swinging to and fro but is still too close to call.

    Yet as the economic crisis has swept all before it and dominated the headlines, a few people are beginning to question what it is that the next occupant of the White House is going to inherit. 'Whoever it is, Obama or McCain, I really don't envy the next President,' said Masket.

    Locking horns

    'I could walk [100 miles] from here to Lansing and I wouldn't run into a single person who thought our economy was doing well, unless I ran into John McCain.'
    Joe Biden, Monday

    'The fundamentals of our economy are strong. But these are very, very difficult times.' 
    John McCain, Monday

    'Yesterday, John McCain actually said that if he's President he'll take on, and I quote, "the old boys' network in Washington" ... The old boys' network? In the McCain campaign that's called a staff meeting.'
    Barack Obama, Wednesday


    Friday, September 19, 2008

    Wall Street Journal Blasts John McCain


    This from CNN:
    September 19, 2008
    Posted: 01:59 PM ET
    John McCain said 'Raising taxes in a tough economy isn't patriotic.'
    John McCain said 'Raising taxes in a tough economy isn't patriotic.'

    FROM CNN’s Jack Cafferty:

    When you graduate 894th out of a class of 899, eventually it will show up.

    And John McCain’s mediocre performance at the Naval Academy is showing up big time this week in his total lack of understanding of the nation’s financial crisis.

    He told us he didn’t know much about the economy… now he’s proving it.

    So much so that the Wall Street Journal, perhaps America’s leading financial publication, is blasting McCain over what its editorial board sees as inaccurate and, “unpresidential” comments about the crisis in America’s financial system.

    If you’re a Republican running for president of the United States and the Wall Street Journal basically says you’re an incompetent buffoon, you’re in serious trouble.

    Specifically the paper pointed to comments McCain made yesterday about SEC Chair Christopher Cox.

    McCain pointed the finger at Cox and said if he were president, he’d fire him for “betraying the public’s trust.”

    The Wall Street Journal called that assault “both false and deeply unfair.”

    The Journal also said, “In a crisis voters want steady, calm leadership… not easy, misleading answers that will do nothing to help.”

    Deepak Chopra: Palin And The Shadow World


    Fascinating - and calming - reflections on the political process and on the selection of Sarah Palin from Deepak Chopra.  The Fundamentalists and Evangelicals do not own a stranglehold on the fact that politics is indivisible from spirituality, from morality, from our deepest feelings about how life should be lived, how we each should be treated, what kind of world our children should grow up in.  Separation of Church and State is one thing in a pragmatic operational sense, but vote with your heart, vote for the world you wish to see, the world you believe is possible.  Change is possible, not just among society but within ourselves.  We are forever changing: as T S Eliot said, "The still point of the turning world."  Let us change together into a brighter more loving future.

    Tibet Isn't a Buddhist Litmus Test

    Obama and the Palin Effect (Part 2)

    My post a few weeks ago on Sarah Palin acting as Barack Obama’s psychological shadow triggered a lot of people. I thought it would be worthwhile to talk about how one deals with the shadow once it breaks out and begins to disrupt things. But first a short recap: The emergence of Gov. Palin wasn’t simply startling — it was inexplicable. How could 20% of women voters suddenly turn toward her when Palin stands for erasing forty years of feminism? How could the mentality of a small-town mayor morph into a potential President making global decisions? To explain her meteoric rise, I offered the idea that each of us harbors a shadow, a place where our hidden impulses live. By appealing to fear, resentment, hostility to change, suspicion of “the other,” and similar dark impulses, the Republicans have been the shadow’s party for a long time. Sarah Palin put a smiling face on feelings that normally we feel ashamed of.

    The shadow is irrational; it thrives on gut emotions. (A recent Fox News poll ran with the headline, “In their gut, independents choose McCain.”) Bringing the 2008 campaign down to the gut level means bringing it down to the level of the shadow. Instead of listening to an intelligent, persuasive, charismatic man with one African-American parent, people get to say, “I just don’t like blacks. They’re scary; they’re not like me. It’s a gut thing.” Only it’s not. It’s a shadow thing that each of us, not just the right wing, must deal with. Reacting to Palin with fear, confusion, panic, and lashing out also comes from the shadow.

    People who were shocked and dismayed by the Palin effect generally don’t know how to handle shadow energies. Here are a few salient points:

    1. Don’t panic — The shadow is built into your psyche, and when it brings fear, hostility, and resentment to the surface, those feelings want to get out. They cause disruption, but your panic only makes them stick around longer.
    2. Try not to be overwhelmed — Eruptions from the shadow are transitory. If you don’t encourage them, these energies dissipate naturally. If you are overwhelmed, however, the net result is exhaustion and loss of energy.
    3. Remind yourself who you really are — You are much more than your shadow, because your aspirations, hopes, and dreams keep advancing despite the shadow’s apparent power. Pay the least attention to these disruptions as you need to calm down and no more.
    4. Keep a clear focus — The shadow creates disorder and runaway emotions. If you focus on your purpose and remain rational, you will anchor yourself to a more stable reality.
    5. Don’t fight fire with fire — If you sink to the level of dark energies, you will be fighting on their terms, and the likelihood is that you will lose.

    If we translate these points into current politics, they are clearly applicable. The Democrats were triggered by Palin because they fear losing and that fear runs deep. The bogeymen that frighten us the most come from a primitive level; they stir a sense of childish helplessness. But your mature self, like Obama’s campaign organization, is coherent and knows how to carry out its purpose. Realize that American politics has been dominated by shadow issues for decades, so it’s only natural they still have claws and teeth. But their game has gotten old and tired. If you are able to see past the appeal to fear and resentment, have trust that other people can, too.

    The bottom line is that the 2008 election isn’t about change versus experience or a noble candidate who may lose to one who plays dirty. This election is about consciousness. Since the Reagan revolution, consciousness has been sleepy and dull in politics; ideals have been tarnished by cynicism; inner decay has sapped the party in power of its original purpose, leaving only a pointless morass of defensiveness that expresses itself in negativity. If the majority of the electorate wakes up and feels inspired to turn the page, that will happen. Obama has sounded the call; few people missed the message. Now it’s a matter of dealing with a phase of fear and resistance before we discover if stuck consciousness is ready to move ahead.

    Read more Words from Deepak in the archives

    Thursday, September 18, 2008

    Hundreds Of New Marine Species Discovered Off Australia's Great Barrier Reef























    For a much needed break from politics and the turmoil in the global financial markets, take a look at these remarkable photographs in Britain's Guardian newspaper, a miraculous sampling of hundreds of new marine species discovered off of Australia's Great Barrier Reef.

    I can't resist saying that, if this were America, John McCain would probably want to drill there.